In quiet, underfunded classrooms that are tucked in America’s rural towns, many students struggle in silence, facing mental health battles they rarely speak about—and often, there's no one there to listen. The shortage of mental health resources in rural schools leaves young people with limited options, forcing them to navigate common treatable mental issues—anxiety, depression, and stress—almost entirely alone. As the need for mental health support grows, a central question arises: How can we bring real, lasting care to the students who need it most? And with such a specific demographic in mind, how can we work to overcome these geographical barriers? 

This question becomes even more urgent when we consider rising events that can often fuel mental health struggles beyond just the general pressures of adolescence. Additionally, there is a sharp polarization and difference between the mental health of students in urban and rural schooling areas of the United States. In March 2023, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that 42% of high school students in the United States were experiencing significant stress and anxiety, a 50% rise since 2011. However, when examining specific mental health trends—such as suicide mortality—adolescents in rural communities are at a distinct risk, with their suicide rates being nearly double of their urban peers. Additionally, when looking back on the impact of crises, such as the COVID-19 health pandemic, a study conducted with two high schools in semi-rural Georgia revealed that nearly a quarter of the students were deeply concerned about the pandemic, demonstrating the impact of external stressors on the mental well-being of rural youth.

Rural schools in particular also face unique challenges due to their geographic isolation and smaller student populations. These schools can also often lack the financial capacity to hire specialized mental health professionals or provide access to resources like telehealth, which could bridge the gap in service delivery. For example, within rural communities, there are 310 students for every school counselor or psychologist. In contrast, non-rural districts have a slightly lower ratio of 295 students to one counselor or psychologist. A study published in the Journal of Clinical and Translational Science found that 65% of metropolitan countries lack psychiatrists, and that over 60% of rural Americans live in areas where mental health care is considered scarce.  Additionally, stigma surrounding mental health issues in these communities can make it even harder for students to seek help. Another study published in Psychological Assessment found that higher levels of both public stigma and self-stigma were linked to a reduced likelihood of parents seeking mental health services for their children. Specifically, parents with high public stigma were 60% less likely to seek help, while those with high self-stigma were 50% less likely to pursue professional care.

Several mental health school funding programs typically ignore unique rural needs, such as geographic isolation and heightened socio-economic challenges, resulting in limited mental health resources for students in these areas. Many policies/programs also fail to address a key clinical issue, which is to attract mental health professionals to rural schools, where poor reimbursement rates and low retention is common, deterring these professionals from serving in these areas, despite the high need for support. Furthermore, school-based mental health services often lack proper coordination with local healthcare providers, leaving gaps in care continuity for students who need long-term support. 

From a legal standpoint, rural high schools face several challenges in order to sufficiently provide a mental health care system. According to the 2021–22 School Survey on Crime and Safety (SSOCS), the main legal concerns arise around privacy and liability when handling mental health issues, as schools must have specific regulations to protect student confidentiality while also providing necessary support. Additionally, due to the fact that a large number of rural towns are low populated, close-knit communities, this may make it difficult for students who wish to have a sense of anonymity in their mental health services. Coupled with the common negative stigma as mentioned above, adolescents may fear being seen in a mental health clinic or having potential connections to their caregiver.

Mobile mental health units are a rising, innovative solution to the mental health challenges in rural schools. These are moving vehicles—commonly designed to serve underserved areas—that are equipped to provide health services to those who may be unavailable for in-person clinic or hospital visits, and who wish to benefit from services such as crisis intervention, case management, therapy, suicide prevention, and more. These units can also make it possible for students to access mental health care directly on their school grounds, reducing the need for schools to hire in-house counselors, which many schools cannot afford. Additionally, by traveling from school to school, these mobile units can reach a larger number of students in these rural areas.

Moreover, mobile services are known to be significantly more comforting for those who may feel stigmatized by their mental health struggles. As mentioned previously, the stigma in rural communities can prevent actual progress in terms of a student’s care. The mobile units provide an additional level of privacy by providing a separate, enclosed space. Rather than a student seeking care in a clinic/hospital or a school office where they can be commonly spotted, these units are often designed like private consultation rooms, allowing students to enter discreetly.

In terms of financial aspects, mobile mental health units are considerably cheaper in comparison to traditional service methods. As discovered in the Mobile Health Map, every $1 spent on mobile health services is able to save an individual $12. Additionally, in the case of emergencies, students can avoid expensive hospital visits by frequently opting to use mobile clinic visits instead, which can possibly result in an average of 600 fewer emergency room visits a year. For rural schools with limited budgets, rather than relying on scarce professionals or expensive methods like telehealth, mobile units provide a cost-effective solution that could reduce financial burdens on both administrators and families.

Partnerships with mental health organizations and nonprofits, such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which is authorized under Title XIX of the Public Health Service Act, can offer funds to all 50 American states for community mental health based projects, specifically those that provide mental health services and target children with serious mental health needs for treatment.  The Community Mental Health Services Block Grant (MHBG) program has received significant financial support from government officials. Specifically, the U.S. Department of Health and Humans Services (HHS) allocated $59.4 million to the program as a part of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA)—signed under the Biden Administration—helping to achieve its goal of addressing the nation’s ongoing mental health crisis. A state can use the funds from the MHBG and distribute them to local government entities and nongovernment organizations, which can include the mobile mental health unit project.

Addressing the mental health crisis in rural schools requires a multifaceted approach, focusing on solutions that acknowledge the background and common challenges of these schools. Focusing on initiatives workable to rural areas can provide hope for a future where every student, no matter where they live, has access to the care and resources they need to thrive. It’s not just about filling gaps out of necessity; it’s about ensuring that all students can grow emotionally, feel supported, and ultimately, succeed for the future of their communities.

Work Cited

• “Biden-Harris Administration Awards More than $64 Million in Grants to Fund Mental Health Services and Awareness Training across United States and Territories.” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 23 Aug. 2023, www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/08/23/biden-harris-administration-awards-more-than-64-million-grants-fund-mental-health-services-awareness-training-united-states-territories.html. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “YRBS Data Summary & Trends Report.” Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS), 1 July 2024, www.cdc.gov/yrbs/dstr/index.html. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Chanell Baylor. “Community Mental Health Services Block Grant.” SAMHSA, 21 Feb. 2014, www.samhsa.gov/grants/block-grants/mhbg. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• “Child Mental Health: Rural Policy Brief.” U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, www.cdc.gov/rural-health/php/policy-briefs/child-mental-health-policy-brief.html. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• “COE - Prevalence of Mental Health Services Provided by Public Schools and Limitations in Schools’ Efforts to Provide Mental Health Services.” Nces.ed.gov, July 2024, nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/a23/school-mental-health-services?tid=4. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Fontanella, Cynthia A., et al. “Widening Rural-Urban Disparities in Youth Suicides, United States, 1996-2010.” JAMA Pediatrics, vol. 169, no. 5, May 2015, p. 466, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3561. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Gazmararian, Julie, et al. “Impact of COVID ‐19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Students from 2 Semi‐Rural High Schools in Georgia.” Journal of School Health, vol. 91, no. 5, Apr. 2021, pp. 356–69, https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13007. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Hill, Paul T. “If America Neglects Its Rural Schools, Nobody Wins | RealClearEducation.” Www.realcleareducation.com, 12 Feb. 2016, www.realcleareducation.com/articles/2016/02/12/if_america_neglects_its_rural_schools_nobody_wins_1261.html. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• “How Do Mobile Health Clinics Improve Access to Health Care?” Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 16 June 2021, publichealth.tulane.edu/blog/mobile-health-clinics/. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Leo, Aaron. “Adapting to Youth Mental Health Needs in Rural Schools: Lessons from NYKids’ Latest Study.” NYKids - University at Albany, 16 Aug. 2024, ny-kids.org/adapting-to-youth-mental-health-needs-in-rural-schools-lessons-from-nykids-latest-study/. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• “Mental Health Stigma in Rural Communities.” RHIhub - Rural Health Information Hub, www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/mental-health/4/stigma. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• “Mobile Units Model.” RHIhub - Rural Health Information Hub, www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/mental-health/2/access/mobile-units. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Morales, Dawn A., et al. “A Call to Action to Address Rural Mental Health Disparities.” Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, vol. 4, no. 5, Nov. 2024, pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.42.
• Phillips, Lindsey. “A Closer Look at the Mental Health Provider Shortage.” Www.counseling.org, May 2023, www.counseling.org/publications/counseling-today-magazine/article-archive/article/legacy/a-closer-look-at-the-mental-health-provider-shortage. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Springett, Quinn. “Mobile Mental Health Clinics: What Are They and What Do They Do?” AVAN Mobility, 4 Mar. 2024, www.avanmobility.com/learning-center/mobile-mental-health-clinic/. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Stanford, Libby. “Report Outlines the Distinct Challenges Facing Rural Schools.” Education Week, 17 Nov. 2023, www.edweek.org/leadership/report-outlines-the-distinct-challenges-facing-rural-schools/2023/11. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• “The Benefits of PMHC’s Mobile Mental Health Services - Philadelphia Mental Health Center.” Philadelphia Mental Health Center, 13 Apr. 2024, pmhccares.org/the-benefits-of-pmhcs-mobile-mental-health-services/. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
• Williams, Stacey L., and Jodi Polaha. “Rural Parents’ Perceived Stigma of Seeking Mental Health Services for Their Children: Development and Evaluation of a New Instrument.” Psychological Assessment, vol. 26, no. 3, 2014, pp. 763–73, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036571. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.