Reagan and Thatcher

This presentation discusses similarities and differences between former President Reagan and former Prime Minister Thatcher

Published by   

Akshat Yadav

   on   

September 19, 2022

Inquiry-driven, this project may reflect personal views, aiming to enrich problem-related discourse.

HeadingHeading 3

Card Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet conse adipiscing elit

Card Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet conse adipiscing elit

Card Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet conse adipiscing elit

Card Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet conse adipiscing elit

Support

Citation

APA: Yadav, A. (2022, September 20). Reagan and Thatcher. Institute for Youth in Policy. Retrieved [Insert Today's Date] from https://cite.yipinstitute.org/oeefVyS

MLA: Yadav, Akshat. “Reagan and Thatcher.” Institute for Youth in Policy, Institute for Youth in Policy, 20 Sept. 2022, https://cite.yipinstitute.org/oeefVyS.

Acknowledgement

The Institute for Youth in Policy wishes to acknowledge Marielle DeVos, Paul Kramer, Riya Kataria, Lilly Kurtz, and other contributors for developing and maintaining the Programming Department within the Institute.

Other Fellowship Capstones

Emergency Medical Services For All: A Case for Publicaly Funded EMS

In

Capstones - Spring 2026

By

Jaden Glogg

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in the United States operate under a fragmented funding system that relies heavily on patient billing, insurance reimbursements, and inconsistent local funding sources. As ambulance transport costs continue to rise, many Americans, particularly those from low-income communities, face significant financial barriers to accessing emergency medical care. This policy brief examines the consequences of the current fee-for-service EMS model, including delayed emergency response utilization, health inequities, and financial instability among EMS providers. Drawing upon historical developments, current funding challenges, and existing policy initiatives, the brief argues that EMS should be recognized and funded as an essential public service comparable to fire and police protection. The analysis evaluates three policy options: federal designation of EMS as an essential service with dedicated block-grant funding, expanded Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement reform, and state-level public EMS authority models. While each option offers potential improvements, federal designation combined with sustained public funding provides the most comprehensive solution for eliminating patient billing and ensuring equitable access to emergency care. By restructuring EMS financing around public investment rather than individual payment, policymakers can improve health outcomes, strengthen emergency response systems, and ensure that all Americans receive emergency medical assistance regardless of their ability to pay.

more