Iran Teeters on Regime Change

This brief will cover the recent political turmoil in Iran, starting from escalating tensions over nuclear enrichment to the assassination of the Iranian Supreme Leader to the Iranian government’s murky future.

Published on  

March 20, 2026

  by

At YIP, nuanced policy briefs emerge from the collaboration of six diverse, nonpartisan students.

HeadingHeading 3

Card Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet conse adipiscing elit

Card Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet conse adipiscing elit

Card Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet conse adipiscing elit

Card Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet conse adipiscing elit

Support

I. Executive Summary 

Tensions between Iran and the United States erupted at the end of February 2026 with a sudden military escalation in the Iranian region. With war declared, missiles launched, and military leaders killed, the path to peace grows increasingly complicated. 

II. Overview 

A. Context 

On February 28, 2026, Iran was attacked from a coordinated Joint missile attack from the U.S. and Israel, resulting in the death of Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran.  Prior to this eventful circumstance, tensions have been noted from aggressive statements delivered by President Trump regarding Iran’s nuclear capabilities. The reasons for this campaign, explained by Trump, is to “eliminate imminent threats from the Iranian regime” by aiming to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities, preventing nuclear development, and halting the Iranian navy. In response to the fatal strikes, Iran struck back at the partnered countries, targeting American facilities in the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, and other countries. Tel Aviv and Jerusalem were also targeted. As of recently, attacks continue toward Iran from Israel. Trump demands an “unconditioned surrender” to ultimately stop the strikes.

B. Historical Tensions 

The U.S. and Iran have long maintained a testy relationship; the current conflict manifests as one of many clashes. Dating from the mid-20th century, the U.S. has demonstrated considerable engagement in Iranian political affairs such as its funding of coup d'etats. Following the 9/11 attacks of 2001, U.S. involvement in the Middle East was newly justified as anti-terrorism efforts to eliminate weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). A prime example is the 2003 invasion of Iraq, where statements of Iran’s WMDs and connections to Al-Qaeda led to the disestablishment of Saddam Hussein’s regime and a search for evidence of nuclear development. Despite no conclusive evidence of WMDs in Iran, the U.S. actively aims to neutralize nuclear development in Iran and other Middle Eastern countries.
In 2015, the Obama administration negotiated and implemented the Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), with the United Kingdom, France, China, Russia, and Germany. Iran was to agree to limit its nuclear capabilities, ranging from reducing uranium stockpile by 98% and enrichment to 3.67% overseen by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),  in exchange for sanctions relief. The JCPOA sought to prevent a revival of Iran’s nuclear weapon system and reduce potential conflict with its regional rivals. Although President Trump’s withdrawal from the JCPOA in  2018 allowed Iran to resume its nuclear developments temporarily, Trump’s administration in 2025 again ordered a crackdown on Iranian nuclear sites and the conjoined assault of February 28, aiming to eliminate the facilities. 

III. Policy Problem 

A. Current Stances 

Following the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the escalation of trilateral tensions, policymakers and analysts have begun debating the future of Iran’s political system. The “war hawks” argue that the current instability presents an opportunity to dismantle the Islamic Republic and pursue regime change. These voices support a more aggressive strategy that would weaken Iran’s military infrastructure and prevent the country from rebuilding its nuclear capabilities. In contrast, more cautious voices advocate for diplomatic restraint. This “pacifist” stance warns that forcing regime change from the outside could create significant regional instability, potentially leading to prolonged conflict similar to those in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Several proposals have emerged regarding the future of the Iranian government upon its possible collapse. One prominent figure discussed in these conversations is Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s former monarch who advocates for a transition toward a secular democratic government in Iran through constitutionalism and free elections. Other proposals include the formation of a democratic republic led by opposition groups or a transitional coalition government that could guide the country toward political reform. At the same time, some believe a modified version of Iran’s current theocratic system could emerge if religious leadership retains significant influence. These competing proposals highlight the uncertainty surrounding Iran’s political future and the broader debate over how the international community should respond to potential regime change.

B. Policy Impact 

The War Powers Resolution is a federal law passed in 1973 reaffirming Congress’s authority over declaring war with another nation. Under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution,1 only Congress has the power to declare war; the President must notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying US troops into hostilities. Any unauthorized hostility is limited to 60 days. While Congress attempted to invoke the War Powers Act in response to President Trump’s military activity against Iran, the proposal failed to pass both chambers.2  

IV. References

News, NBC. 2026. “Live Updates: U.S. Military Begins ‘Major Combat Operations in Iran,’ Trump Says.” NBC News. February 28, 2026. https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/live-blog/israel-iran-live-updates-rcna261099.

Walsh, Joe, Kathryn Watson, and Tucker Reals. 2026. “Why Is the U.S. Attacking Iran? Here’s What the Trump Administration Has Said Motivated the Strikes.” Cbsnews.com. March 3, 2026. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-us-attack-iran-trump-administration/.

Ventura, Tiago. 2026. “Trump Says There Will Be No Deal with Iran except ‘Unconditional Surrender.’” TIME. Time. March 6, 2026. https://time.com/7382878/trump-iran-war-unconditional-surrender-demand/.

George W. Bush Library. 2014. “The Iraq War | George W. Bush Library.” Www.georgewbushlibrary.gov. 2014. https://www.georgewbushlibrary.gov/research/topic-guides/the-iraq-war.

The White House. 2016. “Iran Deal.” The White House. 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/node/328996.

Council on Foreign Relations. 2017. “What Is the Iran Nuclear Deal? | Council on Foreign Relations.” Cfr.org. April 11, 2017. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounders/what-iran-nuclear-deal.

Hernandez, Joe. 2026. “7 Key Points in U.S.-Iran Relations since 1953.” NPR. March 2, 2026. https://www.npr.org/2026/03/02/nx-s1-5731590/us-iran-relations-history-coup-revolution-nuclear.

The United States of America, “War Powers Resolution of 1973 | Richard Nixon Museum and Library,” www.nixonlibrary.gov, July 27, 2021, https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/news/war-powers-resolution-1973.

Policy Brief Authors

Chenya Kwon

Team Lead, Rapid Response Policy

Chenya Kwon is a student at Westlake High School in California. She joined YIP as a 2025 Summer Fellow and currently serves as a Rapid Response Policy Team Lead, driven by her interest in current events, history, and civics.

Author's Profile

Lincoln Trumps

2025 Summer Fellow

Lincoln Trumps is a student at Lafayette High School in Louisiana. He has maintained a lifelong interest in policy and history ever since his first exposure to history books at his local library as a young child. Since then Lincoln has developed his interest into his role as Secretary General of Louisiana's Model United Nations and President of Speech & Debate. Recently, he had the opportunity to speak at a national Youth-Oriented PAC's Winter Gala and he looks forward to future involvement intending to major and specialize in political philosophy.

Author's Profile

Aisha V Foday

Rapid Response Analyst

Aisha works at researching and composing unbiased and nonpartisan writing for YIP's Research Briefs about national and global issues: truth is of strong value to her. Aisha is also passionate in STEM activities an aspires to be an engineer working in Aerospace in college. She lives in Nevada and attends Mater Academy East.

Author's Profile

David Halimi

Rapid Response Analyst

David Halimi is a motivated high school student located in New York with a strong interest in public policy, economics, and business. At YIP, he conducts in-depth research on current affairs and contributes to the organizations mission by writing clear, engaging, and well-structured policy briefs. his work focuses on analyzing complex topics, identifying solutions, and communicating ideas that promote informed decision making among young leaders and policymakers.

Author's Profile

Adriana Concepcion

Rapid Response Analyst Intern

Adriana Concepcion is a Rapid Response Analyst Intern at the Youth Institute for Policy, where she contributes to breaking down national policy issues for a broader public audience. Her work centers on making political discourse more accessible and advocating for education equity, particularly for first-generation college students. Outside of YIP, Adriana studies Media and Journalism with a focus on Advertising and Public Relations, as well as Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She brings a multidisciplinary background in editorial work, policy research, and youth-centered digital media. Adriana is also a staff writer for several publications and actively collaborates on digital wellness and storytelling projects as part of Headstream by Second Muse.

Author's Profile