Executive Summary

Land conservation is an urgent issue in the United States due to the accelerating loss of agricultural land, biodiversity decline, and ecosystem degradation. This brief explores the interaction between landowners, policymakers, and environmental organizations in conservation efforts. It suggests that by expanding incentive-based programs and fostering public-private partnerships, we can significantly enhance biodiversity protection, sustain ecosystem services, and ensure the long-term preservation of natural landscapes. These strategies can also drive economic growth, improve public health, and strengthen community resilience.

Overview

The United States faces a growing array of challenges related to land conservation, including the loss of agricultural land, habitat destruction, and biodiversity loss. Despite ongoing efforts such as incentive-based programs, much land remains vulnerable to degradation. This brief explores the root causes of these challenges and proposes comprehensive solutions to protect ecosystems, ensure sustainable land use, and preserve biodiversity for future generations.

Relevance:
As environmental, economic, and community health challenges intensify, the importance of land conservation has grown significantly. States like Virginia, which host a diverse range of federally listed threatened or endangered species, face tremendous pressure. Loss of biodiversity is evident across North America, including a staggering 30% loss of bird populations due to habitat destruction. Over the past two decades, the U.S. has lost over 11 million acres of farmland, directly impacting local economies and food security. This further threatens agricultural productivity, forces reliance on distant food sources, and increases grocery prices.

Beyond food security, the lack of sufficient land protection has broader consequences for water quality and climate resilience. Decreased biodiversity and ecosystem services increase the cost of providing clean drinking water, while climate-induced disasters like hurricanes and flooding become more frequent and severe. Land conservation can mitigate these effects by preserving critical carbon sinks such as forests and wetlands and enhancing local resilience.

History

Current Stances:
The U.S. has a history of supporting land conservation, starting with the creation of Yellowstone National Park in 1872, the world's first national park. Over the years, various policies have been implemented to protect natural resources, but the country now ranks 35th on the Yale Environmental Performance Index (EPI), with limited progress in recent years. Environmentalists are calling for stricter regulations and greater funding for conservation programs like the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) to protect critical areas and resources.

Indigenous communities have practiced sustainable land stewardship for centuries, emphasizing the cultural and ecological importance of land conservation. Many Indigenous groups advocate for the protection of sacred sites and traditional knowledge, yet past government-led conservation efforts have excluded Indigenous perspectives or displaced Native communities. Recent co-management efforts between federal agencies and Indigenous tribes offer a promising model for collaborative conservation.

Policy Problem

Stakeholders:
The primary stakeholders in land conservation are private landowners, particularly those managing large agricultural or rural properties. These landowners are pivotal in conservation efforts, deciding whether to engage in programs like conservation easements, which offer tax incentives in exchange for maintaining land in its natural state. Local communities also play a crucial role, as land conservation affects essential resources like clean water, air quality, and agricultural land, which directly impact community well-being.

Risks of Indifference:
Failure to act on land conservation will lead to continued loss of agricultural land, biodiversity, and the degradation of ecosystem services. This would exacerbate food insecurity, reduce local employment opportunities, and harm local economies. The environmental impacts would also be dire, with the loss of wildlife habitats and the collapse of key ecosystem functions like carbon sequestration and water filtration. Additionally, cities that ignore land conservation may face increased vulnerability to extreme weather events, loss of green spaces, and diminished tourism appeal.

Nonpartisan Reasoning:
Land conservation is not only an environmental issue but also an economic, public health, and community resilience concern. It safeguards agricultural productivity, keeps food costs affordable, and ensures a stable local food supply. It also reduces the financial burden on municipal water treatment systems by naturally filtering pollutants, ensuring clean water for residents. Furthermore, land conservation enhances community resilience by reducing the impact of extreme weather events and improving quality of life.

Tried Policy

City of Alexandria Resilience Plan (2021):
This plan represents a significant effort to address flooding and climate resilience through a combination of green and gray infrastructure. It includes stream restoration, floodplain management, and stormwater upgrades. Despite its commendable efforts, the plan has been costly, and Alexandria continues to experience frequent flooding, particularly in vulnerable neighborhoods.

Case Study:
A successful example of green infrastructure for flood mitigation is the Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) in Ramsey County, Minnesota. From 2007 to 2012, the district implemented a range of green infrastructure measures, including rain gardens, stormwater ponds, and underground storage systems, to mitigate flooding and improve water quality. The CRWD's approach demonstrated that natural solutions, such as rain gardens, can be cost-effective and environmentally beneficial compared to traditional gray infrastructure, which was estimated to cost $2.5 million.

Policy Options

1. Incorporating Rain Gardens into Green Infrastructure Strategy:
Rain gardens, which absorb and filter runoff, reduce flooding, and improve water quality, should be integrated into existing green infrastructure strategies. By combining rain gardens with other green infrastructure elements like permeable pavements and urban tree canopies, cities can enhance resilience, lower costs, and improve aesthetic and environmental quality.

2. Green Infrastructure Grant Program:
A new grant program would provide financial assistance to homeowners for installing green infrastructure elements like rain gardens and permeable pavements. This would make it easier for homeowners to adopt sustainable practices, reduce stormwater runoff, and enhance neighborhood resilience. The program could also help lower water bills, increase property values, and improve the overall quality of life in urban areas.

Conclusions

This brief has outlined the significant challenges, stakeholder concerns, and potential policy solutions for enhancing land conservation in the United States. By refining existing legislation, expanding incentive-based programs, and fostering public-private partnerships, the U.S. can protect its natural resources, support economic growth, and ensure the long-term sustainability of its communities. Through thoughtful policy design and collaboration, land conservation efforts can safeguard not only the environment but also the nation's public health, economy, and resilience against climate change. Prioritizing land conservation today is critical for ensuring a prosperous and sustainable future for generations to come.

References

‍