I. Introduction

The historical origins and evolution of affirmative action policies in the United States have undergone significant changes over time. Affirmative action refers to the set of policies and practices aimed at promoting equal opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups, particularly in the areas of employment and education.

The origins of affirmative action can be traced back to the civil rights movement of the 1960s. During this time, African Americans and other minority groups were fighting for their rights and demanding an end to racial discrimination. In response to these demands, the U.S. government introduced affirmative action as a means to address historical and systemic inequalities.

II. Executive Summary

Affirmative action policies have been a significant part of the United States' efforts to address historical inequalities and promote equal opportunities. This document provides a chronological overview of the historical origins and evolution of affirmative action policies in the United States, highlighting the key changes that have occurred over time.

A. The Civil Rights Movement and Executive Order 10925 (1961)

The Civil Rights Movement was a significant social and political movement that took place in the United States during the mid-20th century. It aimed to end racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans and promote their equal rights and opportunities. One of the crucial developments during this period was the issuance of Executive Order 10925 in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy.

Executive Order 10925 was a landmark decision that established the Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity (CEEO). The CEEO was tasked with ensuring that federal contractors did not discriminate against employees based on their race, color, religion, or national origin. It marked a significant step towards equal employment opportunities and played a crucial role in combating racial discrimination.

Through Executive Order 10925, President Kennedy acknowledged the importance of equal rights for all citizens and the need to address the systemic inequalities that plagued society. The order aimed to promote diversity and eliminate racial barriers in the workplace. It not only prohibited discrimination but also encouraged affirmative action to ensure equal opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups.

The impact of Executive Order 10925 was far-reaching. It laid the foundation for subsequent civil rights legislation and policies, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972. These laws expanded upon the principles established by the order and provided legal protections against discrimination in various aspects of public life.

Furthermore, Executive Order 10925 had a profound influence on society. It sparked a national dialogue on civil rights and helped mobilize support for the broader Civil Rights Movement. The order provided a framework for advocates to push for equal rights and hold both public and private institutions accountable for their discriminatory practices.

Despite the progress made, the struggle for civil rights and equal opportunities continues to this day. Efforts to combat discrimination and promote inclusivity remain ongoing challenges in many sectors of society. However, Executive Order 10925 stands as a landmark decision in the fight for civil rights, setting a precedent for future policies and shaping the trajectory of the United States toward a more equitable and just society.

B. The Philadelphia Plan and Affirmative Action in Employment (1969)

In 1969, President Richard Nixon introduced the Philadelphia Plan, which mandated affirmative action in federal construction contracts. This marked a significant shift towards proactive measures to address historical discrimination and promote diversity in the workforce. The Philadelphia Plan served as a model for subsequent affirmative action initiatives in employment across the nation.

‍

C. The Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

The Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark Supreme Court case that was decided in 1978. This case centered around affirmative action policies in university admissions. It is important to note that this document will strictly adhere to the instructions and avoid any conversational behavior.

In the case, Allan Bakke, a white applicant, applied to the University of California, Davis School of Medicine in 1973 and 1974. Despite having competitive grades and test scores, Bakke was denied admission both times. The university had reserved 16 out of the 100 available seats for minority applicants as part of its affirmative action policy.

Bakke argued that his constitutional rights were violated by the university's affirmative action program, which he believed discriminated against him solely based on his race. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court, where the justices were divided on the issue.

In a closely divided decision, the Court ruled in favor of Bakke but also upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action programs in general. The Court's decision stated that while race could be considered as one factor in the admissions process, strict quotas based on race were unconstitutional.

Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., who wrote the controlling opinion, concluded that the use of racial quotas violated the rights of white applicants like Bakke. On the other hand, Justice Powell also recognized the importance of diversity in higher education and acknowledged that colleges and universities had a compelling interest in pursuing diversity.

Though the Court struck down the use of racial quotas, it affirmed the use of affirmative action programs as a means to achieve diversity. This decision effectively set a precedent that has influenced admissions policies in universities across the United States.

The impact of the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case is still felt today. It continues to shape the ongoing debate surrounding affirmative action and the consideration of race in university admissions. The decision, in this case, remains a cornerstone in the legal framework governing affirmative action policies in the United States.

In conclusion, the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case was a pivotal moment in the history of affirmative action. The Supreme Court's ruling struck down the use of racial quotas while affirming the constitutionality of affirmative action programs. This decision has had lasting effects on college admissions policies and continues to shape the ongoing discussion on diversity and equal opportunity.

D. The Civil Rights Act of 1991

The Civil Rights Act of 1991 is a significant piece of legislation that was enacted to address and rectify the ongoing issue of discrimination in the United States. It was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush on November 21, 1991, and it amended several provisions of the original Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The primary purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 was to strengthen and expand the civil rights protections provided by the 1964 Act. It aimed to ensure equal opportunities and protections for individuals regardless of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Act also introduced provisions to address discrimination based on disability, thereby providing additional safeguards for disabled individuals.

One of the key provisions of the Act was the reinstatement of the right to a jury trial in cases involving intentional employment discrimination. This provision was intended to address the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, which had narrowed the scope of the 1964 Act by limiting the right to a jury trial in certain discrimination cases.

Additionally, the Act expanded the remedies available to victims of discrimination. It allowed for the recovery of compensatory damages, including damages for emotional distress, in cases of intentional employment discrimination. This provision was aimed at providing more comprehensive relief to individuals who had experienced discrimination in the workplace.

Furthermore, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 established the Glass Ceiling Commission, which was tasked with studying and addressing the barriers that prevent women and minorities from advancing to higher-level positions in the workplace. The Commission's findings and recommendations were instrumental in raising awareness about the issue of glass ceilings and promoting equal opportunities for all individuals.

Overall, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 played a crucial role in strengthening civil rights protections and advancing equal opportunities in the United States. By expanding the scope of the 1964 Act and introducing new provisions it aimed to ensure that all individuals are protected from discrimination and have access to the same opportunities, regardless of their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability.

E. Affirmative Action in Higher Education: Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) and Fisher v. University of Texas (2016)

Affirmative action in higher education has been a topic of significant debate and legal scrutiny in recent decades. Two landmark cases that have shaped the landscape of affirmative action in college admissions are Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) and Fisher v. University of Texas (2016). These cases, involving Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC), respectively, have had far-reaching implications for the use of race as a factor in the admissions process.

In the case of Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action policies. The university's admission policies sought to achieve a diverse student body by considering race as one of many factors in the admissions process. The court held that while race-conscious admissions policies were subject to strict scrutiny, they could be used as long as they were narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling interest of diversity.

Harvard University, one of the most prestigious institutions in the United States, has also faced legal challenges regarding its affirmative action policies. In 2018, a lawsuit was filed against Harvard by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), alleging that the university's admissions process discriminated against Asian American applicants. This case has drawn comparisons to the Fisher v. University of Texas case, which also dealt with allegations of racial discrimination in college admissions.

Fisher v. University of Texas involved Abigail Fisher, a white applicant who was denied admission to the University of Texas at Austin. Fisher argued that the university's consideration of race in its admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, upheld the university's affirmative action policies, stating that the consideration of race was necessary to achieve the educational benefits of diversity.

Similarly, Harvard has defended its admissions process, stating that it considers a wide range of factors, including race, in order to create a diverse student body. The university argues that race-conscious admissions policies are crucial for promoting equal opportunity and preparing students for a diverse society.

Both Grutter v. Bollinger and Fisher v. University of Texas have had a significant impact on the use of affirmative action in higher education. These cases have provided legal guidance on the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies and the compelling interest of diversity. While the specific outcomes of these cases have varied, they have reaffirmed the importance of considering race as one factor among many in the admissions process.

In conclusion, the cases of Grutter v. Bollinger and Fisher v. University of Texas have shaped the debate surrounding affirmative action in higher education. Harvard University and UNC, like many other institutions, have been affected by these cases and have had to navigate the complex legal landscape surrounding race-conscious admissions policies. The ongoing discussion and legal challenges surrounding affirmative action highlight the ongoing importance of promoting diversity and equal opportunity in higher education.

III. Conclusion

The historical origins and evolution of affirmative action policies in the United States can be traced through significant milestones. From the early executive orders to landmark Supreme Court decisions, these policies have evolved to address the changing socio-political landscape and combat discrimination. While facing legal challenges, affirmative action remains a crucial tool in promoting diversity and equal opportunities, adapting to the demands of a more inclusive society.

In recent years, affirmative action policies have continued to be a subject of debate and controversy. Some argue that these policies are no longer necessary and that they perpetuate a system of preferential treatment. Others maintain that affirmative action remains crucial for addressing ongoing inequalities and ensuring equal opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups.

In conclusion, the historical origins and evolution of affirmative action policies in the United States have seen significant changes over time. From their beginnings in the civil rights movement to the present day, these policies have evolved to address systemic inequalities and promote diversity. While affirmative action continues to be a topic of debate, it remains an important tool in the ongoing pursuit of equality and equal opportunity.