The Conservative Case for Upholding Roe v. Wade
In
Social Policy
By
Jack Samet
Roe v. Wade egregiously misinterpreted constitutional provisions, disrespected constitutional principles, and caused irreparable damage to the Supreme Court as an institution. But in the aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson, which overturned Roe, it has become clear that Roe should not have been overturned. This has to do with both how the Supreme Court should consider precedent in its decisions and even analyze the social impacts of its previous decisions when considering cases that directly challenge long-standing legal precedent